Athlon XP Gets 166MHz FSB
Oct 16, 2002 #4 (You must log in or sign up to reply here.) Show Ignored Content Topic Status: Not open for further replies. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK? 01 / 19 / 2017 | 2:04PM RSS Newsletter Hardware Sections Beginners Guides Cases and Access. Forums > Chips > AMD ATHLON XP 2000 at 166MHz FSB "AMD ATHLON XP 2000 at 166MHz FSB" Started 6/15/2007 by Michael Driscoll in Chips Forum (3 posts) No post at FSB 166 mhz (once, it did flash a post screen stating AMD Athlon XP 2800 for about 2 sec. http://quodsoftware.com/athlon-xp/amd-athlon-xp-3200.html
A7V133 XP1700 and PC100 Will 133bus MB work with a 266Bus CPU? 133 CPU bus vs. We have already seen what comes out of it. Here it means that once the FSB gets equal to 166Mhz the PCI and AGP buses still work at the nominal frequencies. More resources See also Athlon xp+ pc133 sdram good? why not try these out
Note that even with 166MHz FSB, the memory frequency will remain only 166MHz because of some limitations imposed by the chipset. Urgent. mooNDude Guest AMD Athlon XP 2800 (Barton Core) will not post at FSB 166 MHz.« on: 08-December-06, 07:00:40 » Per top of the board “stickys” I have read a great number Model Number Frequency L2-Cache FSB Multiplier Voltage TDP Release Date Part Number Athlon XP 1500+ 1333MHz 256 KB 266 MT/s 10x 1.75 V 60.0 W October 9, 2001 AX1500DMT3C Athlon XP
Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. Therefore, AMD started "holding back" Athlon XP family, so that to push it smoothly and painlessly to a new position. We tried to see how greatly the Athlon XP performance grew due to the use of faster system bus. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Benchmarks: Super Pi, POV-Ray Pg 4. Both seem to try and make a difference between modles with on board Lan, and Blue Tooth ready.Take a look at my original box sticker:*As seen on face of MoBo: KT4V However, far not all the boards will work stably with these settings. http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/athlon-xp-gets-166mhz-fsb-2700-and-2800-announced.2789/ And these reasons have to do not only with marketing, but also with engineering.First of all, you should bear in mind the fact that AMD is already looking forward to the
Just doing my homework and reporting my findings so I won’t include actual CMOS settings unless requested. To Get More Info and Daily Reward. But the fate decreed differently…Now we pass over from the synthetic tests to real applications:For office and content creation applications, we used a new SYSmark2002 test set. XP-sp2BIOS I have tried: The original; Ver:10A, ran fine on Athlon XP 1600 (1400 MP) 3 years.•Then with MSI Live Update 3: Installed v. 1c which couldn’t run FSB 166MHz (MSI:”
lhgpoobaaMar 16, 2003, 10:19 AM Tbred A's were rated at XP1700+ to XP2200+.They were all 133 FSB cpu's.Tbred B's go from XP1700+ to XP2700+, with only the XP1700, 1800, 2100, 2400 http://www.geek.com/forums/topic/amd-athlon-xp-2000-at-166mhz-fsb I'm proud of AMD. Registration Log in with your account from ... SMF ©2014, Simple Machines - Theme ©2014 Micro-Star Int l Co.,Ltd.Mobile + Motherboards + Videocards + Memory + Beginners Guides News & Advanced Search Feedback? [X] Directory ofGuides & Reviews
Well, enough of talking, let's pass over to some practice.Testbed and MethodsThis test session was aimed at finding out if the use of 333MHz processor bus is justified for Athlon XP http://quodsoftware.com/athlon-xp/athlon-xp-3200.html Yup, it says all this on the sticker and the in the manual and verified on the MoBo. However, using DDR333 together with asynchronous 133MHz processor bus won't be that efficient. Take the motherboard and redo the seating of the processor, this is much better done with motherboard taken out.At the same time, I suggest you clear CMOS.
Barton core) are running on 166MHz bus.My PC has gone to hell... Username: Password: Cancel Forgot Username / Password? And yes, I'm still head over heels in love with AMD because of their prices. check over here The increase in the FSB frequency will lead to greater EMI, which in its turn will cause overall system instability.
How? Freshly re-seated.All PCI slots empty as I attempt to run bare bones to eliminate problems. (except now running Vido card in 1 slot)Floppy Drive: ribbon unplugged from boardHDD-0: Seagate 8 gb My last point is for the overclockers in the crowd; if AMD moves the Athlon to a 400MHz bus, there is a good chance overclocking will not be quite as much
Even VIA KT333 combined with an Athlon on Palomino core appeared unable to use the entire potential of DDR SDRAM.
With this upcoming FSB change on the horizon for AMD, many consumers will soon confront the eternal "should I buy now or wait" question. System Specs, Benchmarks: Winstone 2002 Pg 3. S/W Audio, LAN, D-Bracket 2. Logged Fredrik GENERAL OF THE ARMY Offline Posts: 16126 There's always a risk. « Reply #1 on: 08-December-06, 19:10:44 » The following error or errors occurred while this message: Best Answer
If someone knows differently and can lead me to official Nfo with a better answer I’m all ears.Just saw this: Latest Official BIOS : KT4 MS-6590 (1.4), KT4V MS-6712 (1.8 ) CD-ROMs / DVDROM Chipsets Computers / SFF PCs Cooling - Heatsinks CPU / Processors Digital Cameras HDD / SSD (Storage) Home Theatre Memory MP3 Players Monitors Motherboards Mouse Pads Networking Notebooks because it's a killing machine... In this case they will need DDR333 memory, high-quality mainboard based on VIA KT333 and AMD Athlon XP processors with an unlocked clock frequency multiplier.
Ask a question and give support. ThouroughBred-B core), 2500+, 2800+ and 3000+ (i.e. found here: •http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=362&kind=1• On a different page than the 2 versions mentioned above. at fsb 100MHz (aprox. 24hr.) I even installed and ran other AMD utillitys while MemTest was running to “stress” the system memory with zero errors.
Cut to sound track: Down on the BIOS again,,, wasn’t that Creedance Clear Water Revival?Any suggestions or insights are much appreciated. Benchmarks: SiSoft Sandra 2003 Pro, PCMark2002 Pg 5. based on KT400A chipset • KT4A Ultra (Standard Version) • KT4A Ultra-SR (Serial ATA RAID) • KT4A Ultra-FISR (Serial ATA RAID, Gigabit LAN, IEEE 1394)And a very similar version So, AMD will do its best to make the ClawHammer bus bandwidth much higher than that of the Athlon XP CPU.
There are pretty many chipsets for different platforms in the market already, which support this memory type. Join the community here. Now that we have that out of the way, let's discuss some of the pro's and con's of moving to a higher FSB. Minimal quantity shipped.