Athlon 64 3800+: FSB Running @ 200 Mhz--wtf?
If the part numbers in the following list are correct, they all came in socket A-versions as well (the 'F'-package). Both cores, produced on a 130 nanometer process, were first introduced on September 23, 2003. Take for instance, an MT-30 and an ML-34. enforcer22Nov 26, 2006, 9:22 AM Forgot about the cool and quite feture. his comment is here
ps2cho01-18-05, 01:42 PMcan somebody check my voltage on the thoroughbred mobiles? Venice, the lower-end part, was produced for both Sockets 754 and 939, and included 512KB of L2 cache. San Diego, the higher-end chip, was produced only for Socket 939 and doubled One thing I'd love to see added, but would take enormous time to track down (if done completely) and a lot of space to add in; individual steppings. The same goes for HT link (although I dont know what it's speed should be). http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/athlon-64-3800-fsb-running-200-mhz-wtf.23661/
Retrieved 2006-09-20. ^ PC Magazine ^ "A Glance at the Future: AMD Hammer Processors and x86-64 Technology". 2002-08-14. Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ Shrout, Ryan (2006-05-23). "AMD's AM2 Platform: Athlon 64 FX-62 Processor Review". CPU-Z memory readings bios and cpu-z give different volt.
Yes, my password is: Forgot your password? It is intended to make 64-bit computing a more secure environment. The later in the alphabet that the second letter appears, the more the model has been designed for mobility (frugal power consumption). Dismiss Notice TechSpot Forums Forums TechSpot Core CPUs and Motherboards Today's Posts Athlon 64 3800+: FSB running @ 200Mhz--wtf?
Similar Topics AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800 Socket 939 Dual Core or Intel Pentium D 940 Presler 800MHz FSB May 1, 2006 Athlon 64 3800, or 3800X2? The Athlon Neo processors are equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache and HyperTransport 1.0 running at 800MHz frequency. So I am stuck with a Palomino 2000+/266 But thanks for the reply. http://newwikipost.org/topic/mhxgZYxZmmCJJHpQ0uFAwqWfOSbnTDcr/What-temp-should-AMD-3800-run.html What interests me is that "CBBID" part, seems to be the first of that line.
And isn't there a mobile 2800 ? Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ Kawamoto, Dawn (2005-11-08). "AMD surpasses Intel in U.S. Join the community here. Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ Freeman, Vince (2005-11-18). "Athlon 64 X2 4600+ & 4200+ Processor Review".
Retrieved 2006-07-08. ^ Breeden II, John (2005-02-27). "'No Execute' Flag Waves Off Buffer Attacks". http://newwikipost.org/topic/dx5TEHAZjsZJ8aoY51tPjFkhSHcypN9Y/AMD-Athlon-64-X2-3800-supposed-to-be-runnin-at-this.html SickBoy01-20-05, 08:00 AMAthlon "C" default voltages are 1.75v not 1.85v.... An example of an OPN would be the following: AXDA2500DKV4D AXD = Architecture 2500= Model Number D = Package K = Vcore V = T-Die 4 = L2 Cache D = All Rights Reserved.
More resources See also Check out my CPU-Z readings CPU-Z HWMonitor and Bios all reading different voltages? http://quodsoftware.com/athlon-64/pentium-4-vs-amd-athlon-64-x2.html Ask a question and give support. Archived from the original on 7 July 2006. The clock of the processors is significantly lower than desktop and other mobile counterparts to reach a low TDP, at 15W maximum for a single core x86-64 CPU at 1.6GHz.
Retrieved 2006-07-06. ^ Shilov, Anton (2003-09-22). "AMD Athlon 64: Strong Demand or Weak Supply?". Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ "AMD Delivers Desktop Product Powerhouse While Reducing Costs For Ecosystem Partners". 2006-05-23. Retrieved 2006-07-07. ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2005-08-01). "Affordable Dual Core from AMD: Athlon 64 X2 3800+". weblink Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - (NT) (NT) I thought that only the FX-60 had an unlocked multiplie by nathanpsz2 / March 15, 2006 9:37 AM PST In reply
Retrieved 2006-07-04. ^ a b "Key Architecture Features".
Here's Socket 940 (http://www.c627627.com/AMD/OpteronAthlon64/) First AMD CPUs (http://www.c627627.com/AMD-Intel) and AMD's Athlon XP Voltage gif (http://c627627.com/AMD/AthlonXP/Voltage/) Mr B02-04-05, 12:05 AMThis is definitely "sticky" material. You said you have an athlon 64 3800 which is 2.4ghz, and you said it was rated at 2.00ghz? Got a stepping not mentioned? Brian Cooley found it for you at CES 2017 in Las Vegas and the North American International Auto Show in Detroit.
Retrieved 2006-09-20. ^ "AMD, IBM Dual Stress Liner Semiconductor Manufacturing Breakthrough". 2004-12-13. Retrieved 2006-09-20. ^ Gavrichenkov, Ilya (2005-04-03). "AMD Athlon 64 3800+ CPU: E3 Processor Core aka Venice at the Door". im 99% sure i got the multipliers right. check over here Archived from the original on 12 September 2006.
Retrieved 2006-07-06. ^ Gavrichenkov, Ilya (2005-04-03). "AMD Athlon 64 3800+ CPU: E3 Processor Core aka Venice at the Door". The second thing is that no cpu has an fsb of 2000mhz that i know of. Retrieved 2006-07-06. ^ Gavrichenkov, Ilya (2004-10-18). "AMD Raises the Bar: AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and AMD Athlon 64 4000+ CPUs Review". I agree, we shouldn't get too hung up on high percentages - overall performance and the best CPU at that platform should factor in and be more important.
yes i understand that, hense the -under construction- notice. Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other usersIllegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal contentOffensive: Sexually explicit or offensive languageSpam: Advertisements or commercial links Submit report Cancel report Track this discussion ps2cho03-19-05, 02:29 PMWell if we do % wise then we can categorize. cpu z seems to list speeds in real speed not ddr speed.
i forgot to remove them, i put them in place to throw into socket 940 but then my class ended and i had to quickly save and log off. Change that FSB:DRAM ratio and you'll be good to get that sucker up to 2.4 to 2.8Ghz stable. But don't beat yourself to death, ps2cho!